 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Wednesday, March 31, 2004
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Technology Adoption by SMEs
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Emergic, an Indian blog by entrepreneur Rajesh Jain, has a fascinating series on small and medium-sized enterprises and technology.
His main premise: small and medium enterprises (SMEs) lag 3-5 years behind larger enterprises when adopting technology. He lists the reasons:- "SMEs are not very IT-focused. For many, IT is an after-thought. Part of the reason is that these enterprises do not necessarily have a dedicated IT department. Most of the decisions are made by the owner-managers or the finance people. As such, the use of IT is limited largely to some of the four basic needs -- email, productivity applications (word processor and spreadsheet), accounting and a website.
- SMEs are hard to reach. They are small and distributed. While it is easy to get to the large companies (and for the large companies to get to the IT vendors), SMEs are a hard market to crack.
- SMEs tend to still follow processes which are largely non-electronic. Because the organizations are small, the business knowledge is more tacit than in digital form. People, especially the senior management, "know" what is happening (and all that needs to be known). This also concentrates decision-making. So, IT's role needs to be to assist in this decision-making process.
- SMEs need more hand-holding and support, and thus can be very demanding customers. This is because they may not necessarily have trained in-house IT staff. At the same time, their ability to pay is quite limited. Hence, as customers, they have been an unattractive market for the IT vendors.
- The most important issue facing SMEs is business growth. They have a fairly close tab of the expenses, so there is little room for optimisation there. The challenge is to generate new business, and manage that new business with the same (or incremental) staff so as to maximise profitability.
- It is not easy for SMEs to educate themselves about new technologies and the impact they can have on their business. While there are all kinds of training institutions for computer languages and software packages, the one segment that still has been addressed on the training side is the business applications of technologies.
- [They have] an even lower ability to spend. They typically need solutions which are a fraction of the cost of what has been available so far."
The series refers primarily to SMEs in emerging markets like India. Yet, the description just as easily could be describing small businesses in developed countries like the United States, Canada, Australia and much of Europe.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By Anita Campbell | Permalink |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tuesday, March 30, 2004
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Health Insurance and Very Small Business
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Medpundit writes that as a solo practitioner physician, the cost of providing health insurance coverage for her employees is more than she can afford.
She believes small businesses are disincented to provide insurance, at least in her area (in the Midwest USA). Employer-provided health insurance premiums are two to four times more expensive than individual policies. Her employees could purchase individual policies, but she is prohibited from contributing to the premiums on their behalf.
As we noted here, the smaller the business, the less likely it will offer health benefits, due to cost. Unfortunately Medpundit, as a very small business with two employees, is in the category of employer where lack of coverage is most prevalent.
When a business has five or fewer employees, the typical health coverage strategies really break down. The economics of a pooled association plan may not make sense because of membership fees. And even many PEOs (professional employer organizations) shy away from employers with under 6 employees, again because of the economics. High deductible plans coupled with HSAs can be good solutions in some situations, but they are not for everyone and may require funding accounts up front.
This business demographic (5 or fewer employees) is ripe for a better health insurance solution. Perhaps one day a health insurer or other provider can figure out a new economic model that works for very small businesses in the U.S.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By Anita Campbell | Permalink |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Monday, March 29, 2004
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Nanotech Entrepreneurs Follow the Money
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
When it comes to nanotech startups, VCs are not exactly falling all over themselves to invest. Most of the funding action right now is in government grants.
That's according to Howard Lovy, News Editor of the nanotech industry's Small Times magazine (click here to subscribe -- you may qualify for a free subscription). In an article at Blogcritics, he provides insight into funding trends for nanotechnology entrepreneurs today: "Government money, though, is a totally different story -- DARPA, NIST ATP, SBIR, the whole alphabet soup. It's really not the private sector that's boosting the industry right now. It's government spending. And that's a fairly normal phenomenon for an industry in its early phase. The government props it up, encourages it, gets R&D moving in the lab, helps it along into the startup phase, and then the Darwinian world of business kicks in.
Even there, though, startups can live to see another day primarily through government grants. And right now, the military is where the money is at. Shop your nanomaterial around and tell a VC that your superstrong, superlight nano-enhanced polymer would be useful for garage doors, and you might be shown the door. But go to DARPA and say it can help reinforce tank or aircraft or cockpit doors and can stop a speeding bullet, and you might have an easier time getting some dough."
Sounds like practical advice for nanotech entrepreneurs and early stage companies.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By Anita Campbell | Permalink |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, March 28, 2004
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
PowerBlog Review: Workers Comp Insider
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Editor's note: This is the eighth in our popular weekly series of PowerBlog Reviews of other weblogs...
The Workers Comp Insider is a "weblog about workers' compensation, risk management, business insurance, workplace health & safety, occupational medicine, injured workers, insurance web tools & technology, and related topics."
This blog is a terrific resource on these niche topics. I've already found useful references.
The Workers Comp Insider is published by the employees of Lynch Ryan, a workers compensation firm in Wellesley, Massachusetts on the east coast of the USA. The firm helps businesses -- large and small -- reduce their workers compensation costs.
The Workers Comp Insider is an interesting example of an established business using a weblog to communicate with customers. They do it without obvious commercials.
This is a weblog that leverages subject matter expertise. They provide the kind of in-depth information and analysis of their subject that you would expect of experts in their field.
One of the most useful features about this blog is the collection of link resources. It reminds me of some of the early link sites on the Internet. Remember how useful they could be before they became crassly commercialized with pop-under ads and other annoyances?
You'll find links to the major governmental and industry sites covering occupational safety, workers compensation, and workplace insurance issues.
But you'll also find links to sites you probably never heard of and that only an expert in the field would know of. For instance, there are links to resources for "latex allergy" and "typing injury FAQ" (bloggers, take note, you might need this last one some day).
In one post, they highlighted workstation (computer) ergonomics. The resources cited are off-the-beaten track and excellent.
Lynch Ryan has done a good job integrating the weblog with their commercial website:
- Even though the weblog has its own URL, it is appended to the company's website. Thus, on the commercial website, you find a menu button for the blog.
- They have placed blog headlines on the home page of the commercial website. This is an excellent way to keep the home page fresh, with regularly updated content.
- The blog uses the same color scheme and graphical elements as the company's commercial website.
The Workers Comp Insider has been on the web since September 2003.
The Power: The power of the Workers Comp Insider is in the subject matter expertise its writers bring to the table. You know they know their stuff. It's an excellent resource for information about on-the-job injuries and workers compensation
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By Anita Campbell | Permalink |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Saturday, March 27, 2004
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Microsoft, Bundling and Small Business
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Just about everyone has weighed in on the recent antitrust ruling by the European Union Commission against Microsoft for its practice of bundling products.
That includes the Small Business Survival Council, a U.S.-based small business advocacy group. They have criticized the ruling on the basis that free markets will provide enough protection, stating "entrepreneurs are hard at work looking to challenge the current dominant market players."
I agree that the EC's decision is not good for small businesses -- but for a different reason.
Microsoft's products simply have had a profound positive impact on small businesses.
I'll go even further: access to affordable desktop technology has been a major driver in the proliferation of small business.
For millions of small businesses, Microsoft's products and perhaps a few others such as Intuit's QuickBooks have created untold productivity gains. They keep small business operating costs low.
They level the playing field. Now even a home-based business has access to the same spreadsheet, word processing and presentation tools as a Fortune 500.
Microsoft has created a uniform technology platform across which businesses can do business quickly, conveniently and efficiently. Microsoft's technology has become as necessary as utilities such as water or electricity -- something you rely upon without thinking about.
Millions of small businesses value Microsoft products because they don't have to expend extra time and money on custom programming. They don't have to cobble together lots of software applications and make them interoperate. They don't have to spend money training employees on how to use new or unusual software programs.
What's more, the very thing the trust-busters complain of is something small business owners value highly: bundling.
Take this example. A friend of mine, a consultant in the medical device field, recently told me a hilarious story about wasting the better part of a day trying to get a document into a client's hands. The document was created by a third party using a software program neither my friend nor her client had. After spending nearly the entire day trying to convert the document into another format and then trying to find someone who had the program, eventually she had the document faxed to her. She then created a PDF for the client.
And what was the program? Ironically, it was Microsoft's Project. As my friend said, she didn't know why Microsoft didn't just bundle Project up with Office. "It would be a lot easier on everyone."
All of which brings me to an interesting question posed by the SeattlePI.com's Microsoft Blog. Todd Bishop muses aloud in response to a reader's question in a recent Walter Mossberg column asking why a certain program was not bundled with Windows. Bishop wonders: is the consumer asking the question asked because he is conditioned to expect bundling or is it because he wants bundling?
When it comes to small business, I think I know the answer. Most small businesses would rather have Microsoft bundle programs, than not. The convenience of having software installed on all computers so that it becomes the business standard is of real value to small businesses.
Undoubtedly I will get a half dozen emails from friends and colleagues in IT businesses. You'll tell me how vastly superior Linux or OS is. But keep in mind you are atypical. The average small business has nowhere near your level of expertise to select, install, integrate and maintain software. And yes, I realize that Microsoft products are the most often attacked with viruses and malware. But smart businesses manage OK with standard antivirus packages. Also, I strongly suspect that if Linux were used more widely, it too would be prone to many more attacks.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By Anita Campbell | Permalink |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Friday, March 26, 2004
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
"Entrepreneur" Means Same in English & French
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Via Philippe Laferriere's French Venture and Entrepreneur blog comes this interesting piece on the state of entrepreneurship in Europe. Citing an article by Julie Meyer, CEO of venture firm Ariadne Capital, in Silicon.com:
"Europe is under threat as never before. It is ... globalisation which is forcing the average European employer and worker to compete with their counterparts on the other side of the planet. Regulating labour laws is a stop-gap measure. What needs to happen to revitalise the European economy is that the average European needs to want to contribute to its growth story. If we focus on being net contributors to the system, rather than net-takers from it, we will see the difference." The article goes on to outline the issues getting in the way of entrepreneurs and small businesses in Europe. They include over-regulation; fear of failure; lack of confidence by small business owners in their own leadership skills; unwillingness of larger companies to take a chance on doing business with smaller companies; venture capital more focused on the "black art" of deal making than on markets and talent; and entrepreneurs taking the safe route to avoid failure instead of taking risks to win.
The article is describing entrepreneurship and small business in Europe. But, to readers from the U.S. -- and, I suspect, other parts of the world -- the issues will sound strikingly familiar. Entrepreneurs and small business owners across the globe have more in common than not, it would seem. In many instances the differences are just a matter of degree.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By Anita Campbell | Permalink |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|